Dew Platt - Dewlogic - Immaculate Regeneration

;

 Copyrights by Dew Platt. All rights Reserved.

 Simplicity of terms should be the new intellectual cool. It is not always an easy thing to do but it’s always worth the try. Any concept that can be simplified should be, so that as much people that can understand it should—that’s cool. In simple terms evolution is that an altered set of genetic trait instructions (amino acid sequence) in an altered environment will evolve, give rise to a new type of being. In much simpler terms, in the beginning, as everything simple should be at or have a beginning, it is the coming-to-be (a gravely slow process) of living being (consciousness + matter) from, believe it, non living material, through a naturally selective self-design process. Nature designed itself!

 This is where I may say OMG (“oh my God”) or OMSM (new coined diction meaning “Oh my scientific miracle.”) Either way the product, this world, is something, isn’t it? It is a miracle—the timeless birth of the unknown (because it had no witnesses), and of the un-thought (because consciousness didn’t exist at the beginning of this time-phase). And new miracles of its kind in human beings are increasingly elusive. What you’ve never seen happen in your lifetime is elusive. What evidence there is that you evolved will only be known by others, say with good luck, a thousand, a million or trillion years down the line. Material evolution is elusive unless you can tell me what human physical trait you’ve witnessed evolved in the last 1000 years. And as a human being, you’re lucky if you make it past a century.  

 This is a subject I feel I am neutral on. Anything could have been possible at the beginning of time, but when something doesn’t make sense I have to say it. That *nothing* (primordial gases, green algae and bacteria as guesses) is the precondition for life is unacceptable. And unless you can put consciousness there as witness, the origin of life will always be subject to guess-work summations. Ironic isn’t it? Here we are making sense of a world that came out of senselessness. Inside this sequence, what are we? Why does it seem easier to believe something senseless that to suspect something improvable? Is that human nature? Even at the most basic level, sequential threading (TCGA sequences) seems a matter of design. If you’ve ever done some knitting, then you know what I mean.

Crazy it may seem to some, but consciousness I believe in the least, must precede nothing. I hold that nothing is a concept, a subset of consciousness. This, in every way that we can conceive reasonability, makes more sense that something as a subset of nothing. You don’t have to agree.

But seriousness aside, I am always curious of what may turn up at the turn of a thousand years. Maybe lizard eyes? It could be hot…say on Shemar Moore where my chances of getting with him could have increased significantly. And where I may have developed cat eyes. I have been accused of something close before. In a thousand years or so, I should have fully evolved. And at that point, I have no doubt; I’ll find lizard eyes attractive on Shemar Moore. Truly, I’ll take him with fish eyes as well. And you’ll be there to witness our romance.    

 Now, an aspect of evolution, mutation, could be a bitch or a blessing. In other words, the change involved in it could make an organism better than the parent organism or it could be worse. The rant, Mr. Baumrin, the Jew in Hitler’s paradise, gives you an evolution I believe is much less elusive, moral evolution, that of a change in conscious perception. This also has a much smaller time span, which is between the World War II period and the present time or any time in the future. In other words, I tried to explore an abstract degenerative gene and then materialize it. Enjoy it and chew on it. Lastly, there is one thing I and Patroc agree on and on which my mind will not be changed—that Mr. Baumrin is a degenerate.